ajaxStardust<p>In my experience with the <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/akashic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>akashic</span></a> , it is or it isn't. <br><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/chatgpt4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>chatgpt4</span></a> is a part of it, so <br>it Is. <br>They are "the Is", but they remain limited. </p><p>Would it not be redundant to discuss the notion of the <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/Akashic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Akashic</span></a>? </p><p>What do you expect "the Is" to "Learn"? </p><p>What do you expect to learn from an LLM? <br>For example, time spent alone in LLM land, may be better spent with theologians from India (at this point in the timeline, approaching the singularity)<br>LOL. </p><p>If you haven't yet, try discussing the concept of human <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/perception" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>perception</span></a> of time, vs "the Is" perception of time (chatGPT, as it were)</p><p>Therefore maybe you are on to something here. <br><a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/tags/TARDIS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TARDIS</span></a> </p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.yesterweb.org/@triptych" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>triptych</span></a></span></p>