This is an interesting take on the NYT’s OpenAI case from @mmasnick.
Less an argument against the merits of the case, more a presentation of how the NYT’s arguments undermine common practices like aggregation, or, y’know, reading competitors’ coverage.
@ernie @mmasnick Not the first time that "big corp" argued that law X applies to their competitor or some new use, but obviously, the same arguments and X do not apply to what they have been doing, DESPITE that the equivalence is obvious.
See, we have been doing this for a long time, so it must be legal. THEY started doing it last year, so it must be obvious criminal, right?