writing.exchange is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small, intentional community for poets, authors, and every kind of writer.

Administered by:

Server stats:

336
active users

#adtech

3 posts3 participants1 post today

Today I moderated a @oecd panel on consent management technologies, examining tensions in this rapidly evolving space. Grateful to panelists from CPPA, Inria, IAB Europe, CNIL, and Trilegal for their insights, and to @SergiGalvezDuran, @ChristinaMichelakaki, and @ClarisseGirot for organizing this valuable discussion. My opening remarks: linkedin.com/pulse/opening-rem

www.linkedin.comOpening Remarks: The Evolution of Consent TechnologiesThank you for the opportunity to moderate this panel today. As we explore emerging technical tools for consent management, I'd like to frame our discussion around key tensions and challenges in this rapidly evolving space.

New pre-print online:

‘The EU Digital Services Act: what does it mean for online advertising and adtech?’

By Pieter Wolters and me.

We explore the question: what does the Digital Services Act mean for online advertising?

We show that some types of ad tech companies, such as ad networks, should be considered platforms.

Comments are welcome! It's a pre-print, so we can still improve it.

arxiv.org/abs/2503.05764

#eu#law#dsa

We should spam big tech platforms with garbage content that makes these adware software systems unusable...

Google Maps - Nothing but absurd and horny furry comments on every business, landmark and government building.

Facebook - Think about your favourite toys growing up and then make a Facebook page for each one! Upload pictures of dirty feet to the timeline.

LinkedIn - Rate shellfish pics by sexual appeal.

X - Do not go there. Never go on X.

The #Meta / #Mozilla in-browser advertising features are already a discrimination+fraud risk, but will get worse if not shut down soon.

Google 2019: we're doing "Privacy Sandbox" ads in the browser so we don't have to do fingerprinting

Google 2025: fingerprinting is back on the menu

The time to call out and deal with #boundaryTesting is _when you notice it_.

Updated: why "privacy-enhancing" ad features don't belong in browsers blog.zgp.org/stop-doing-privac #Firefox #adtech #surveillanceCapitalism

blog.zgp.orgstop putting privacy-enhancing advertising technologies in web browsers
More from Don Marti
Replied in thread
@nemobis@mamot.fr

The fact is that #Mozilla hypocrisy over #privacy and data protection was already evident to any competent programmer.
And it has been evident for years.

In fact, #Google kept them bragging about privacy, while paying them to receive terabytes of personal data about their users' searches, just to have a fake competitor to bring at #antitrust trials.

Now that Google is under serious antitrust scrutiny #Firefox put down the mask for everybody, and directly join the #AdTech industry.

Why?

Because Google needs a fake competitor in that sector too.

In fact, Mozilla is just a geek-friendly PR dept of Google.

They don't serve users or build "user agents" since more then a decade.

They build "Google agents".

@eloquence@social.coop @brooke@bikeshed.vibber.net @mozillaofficial@mastodon.social
Replied in thread

@freny @mttaggart that could be.

But on this page mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/fire Mozilla is claiming "legitimate interest" (LI) as the basis for processing "To serve relevant content and advertising" ...and LI is not a valid basis for processing for ad personalization. (Yes, #privacy laws are hard to keep up with but the conventional #adtech firms have already picked up on that one)

MozillaFirefox Privacy Notice

#Disenshittify, NOW!! We have a chance: #IP!!

"…thanks to internal memos published during last year's #monopoly trial against #Google, we know what they did. They made #search worse. They reduced the system's accuracy it so you had to search twice or more to get to the answer, thus doubling the number of queries, and doubling the number of #ads.

Meanwhile, Google entered into a secret, illegal collusive arrangement with #Facebook, codenamed #JediBlue, to rig the ad market, fixing prices so advertisers paid more and publishers got less." @pluralistic
#adtech
pluralistic.net/2025/02/26/urs

pluralistic.netPluralistic: With Great Power Came No Responsibility (26 Feb 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Another day, another attempt by Microsoft to extract as much revenue as possible from Office users:

"Microsoft has quietly launched a new version of Microsoft Office for Windows that can be used to edit documents for free, no Microsoft 365 subscription or Office license key required. This free version of Office is based on the full desktop apps, but has most features locked behind the Microsoft 365 subscription.

First spotted by Beebom, the free version of Office for Windows includes ads that are permanently on screen when within a document in Word, PowerPoint, and Excel. Additionally, this new free version of Office also only allows you to save files to OneDrive, meaning no support for editing local files.

To access the free version of Office, just skip the prompt to sign-in when you first run an Office app. From there, you will be given the choice to continue to use Office for free in exchange for ads and limited features. In this mode, you can open, view, and even edit documents, just like you can with the web version of Office."

windowscentral.com/software-ap

Windows Central · Microsoft quietly launches free, ad-supported version of Office apps for Windows with limited functionalityBy Zac Bowden

"Tracking and profiling for advertising purposes present significant risks to consumers and society. This is demonstrated by a report commissioned by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations (vzbv). The advertising industry’s practice of categorising and influencing individuals based on their preferences, behaviours and vulnerabilities leads to manipulation, discrimination and a loss of trust. vzbv calls on the European Commission to ban tracking and profiling for advertising purposes and ensure the protection of digital fundamental rights.

“Every click on the internet is tracked because it supposedly reveals something about us: our preferences, desires and interests. The uncontrolled data collection by the advertising industry poses great risks to consumers and society,” says Michaela Schröder, Head of Consumer Policy at vzbv. “Consumers are powerless against the practices of the advertising industry. Existing laws are not sufficient. A ban on tracking and profiling is the only way to ensure meaningful consumer protection,” Schröder states."

vzbv.de/en/personalised-advert

Verbraucherzentrale BundesverbandPersonalised Advertising: Overdue Regulationvzbv report shows: tracking and profiling for advertising purposes pose risks to consumers and society

"For 37 years, Congress has completely failed to pass another consumer privacy law. Which is how we got here – to this moment where you can target ads to suicidal teens, gambling addicted soldiers in Minuteman silos, grannies with Alzheimer's, and every Congressional staffer on the Hill.

Some people think the problem with mass surveillance is a kind of machine-driven, automated mind-control ray. They believe the self-aggrandizing claims of tech bros to have finally perfected the elusive mind-control ray, using big data and machine learning.

But you don't need to accept these outlandish claims – which come from Big Tech's sales literature, wherein they boast to potential advertisers that surveillance ads are devastatingly effective – to understand how and why this is harmful. If you're struggling with opioid addiction and I target an ad to you for a fake cure or rehab center, I haven't brainwashed you – I've just tricked you. We don't have to believe in mind-control to believe that targeted lies can cause unlimited harms.

And those harms are indeed grave."

pluralistic.net/2025/02/20/pri

pluralistic.netPluralistic: Ad-tech targeting is an existential threat (20 Feb 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

#Google Ad-Tech Users Can #Target #NationalSecurity ‘Decision Makers’ and People With Chronic Diseases

Google enables #marketers to target people with serious illnesses and crushing debt—against its policies—as well as the makers of #classified defense technology, a WIRED investigation has found.
#privacy #adtech #advertising #tracking

wired.com/story/google-dv360-b

WIRED · Google Ad-Tech Users Can Target National Security ‘Decision Makers’ and People With Chronic DiseasesBy Dell Cameron

"What happens when humans stop relying on their village, or even their family, for advice on having a kid and instead go online, where there’s a constant onslaught of information? How do we make sense of the contradictions of the internet—the tension between what’s inherently artificial and the “natural” methods its denizens are so eager to promote? In her new book, Second Life: Having a Child in the Digital Age (Doubleday, 2025), Hess explores these questions while delving into her firsthand experiences with apps, products, algorithms, online forums, advertisers, and more—each promising an easier, healthier, better path to parenthood. After welcoming her son, who is now healthy, in 2020 and another in 2022, Hess is the perfect person to ask: Is that really what they’re delivering?"

technologyreview.com/2025/02/1

MIT Technology Review · How to have a child in the digital ageBy Allison Arieff

"Privacy campaigners have called Google's new rules on tracking people online "a blatant disregard for user privacy."

Changes which come in on Sunday permit so-called "fingerprinting", which allows online advertisers to collect more data about users including their IP addresses and information about their devices.

Google says this data is already widely used by other companies, and it continues to encourage responsible data use.

However the company had previously come out strongly against this kind of data collection, saying in a 2019 blog that fingerprinting "subverts user choice and is wrong."

But in a post announcing the new rule changes, Google said the way people used the internet - such as devices like smart TVs and consoles - meant it was harder to target ads to users using conventional data collection, which users control with cookie consent."

bbc.com/news/articles/cm21g005

www.bbc.comFingerprinting: Critics say Google rules put profits over privacyGoogle is allowing advertisers to collect more personal information, which is harder for users to control.