Chuck Darwin<p>The wealth of <a href="https://c.im/tags/Betsy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Betsy</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/DeVos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DeVos</span></a>, <br>by contrast, comes from a simpler operation: <br>the marketing of what some have called a pyramid scheme that goes by the brand name <a href="https://c.im/tags/Amway" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Amway</span></a>. </p><p>Founded by her father-in-law in 1959, Amway distributes home products like dish soap and cosmetics through a network of home-based sellers <br>who are pressured to recruit more sellers in order to earn a bonus on the amount of product the distributor would then sell wholesale to the recruit. <br>That recruit would also be a distributor, looking for recruits of his or her own, in order to sell more products wholesale in order to get that bonus. </p><p>Note the emphasis on recruitment and bonuses rather than the direct-selling to retail customers, <br>who, in the end, were the ones for whom Amway products were ostensibly intended.</p><p>In the business press, Amway is often described as a “multilevel marketing company.” </p><p>In the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission described its business model as <br>an “inherent fraud,” as historian Rick Perlstein reported in The Nation, <br>and tried to shut the company down. <br>The FTC failed in that effort, but did issue orders in 1979 slapping Amway for price-fixing and misrepresenting the kind of money distributors could expect to make. <br>In fact, Amway was made to tell distributors that they could wind up losing money.</p><p>Three decades later, in 2010, a class action lawsuit by former sellers (um, “distributors”) alleging Amway’s engagement in an “illegal scheme” was settled out of court. </p><p>According to USA Today, Amway agreed to pay $55 million to former distributors, <br>closely oversee high-level distributors who run training businesses, <br>strengthen refund policies <br>and make other changes estimated to cost an additional $100 million.</p><p>In Forbes’ 2016 listing of “America’s Largest Private Companies,” Amway clocks in at number twenty-nine.</p><p>The education secretary, née Elisabeth Prince, did not come into the DeVos family empty-handed. <br>Her own family of origin, while not as wealthy as her husband’s, was quite well-to-do through her father’s enterprise, 💥Prince Corporation💥, itself a privately held company until Johnson Controls bought it for $1.3 billion in cash in 1996. </p><p>Founder <a href="https://c.im/tags/Edgar" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Edgar</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Prince" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Prince</span></a>, seeking to change the political culture to more closely resemble his own heartless Calvinism, <br>donated, according to Zack Stanton of Politico, “millions in seed funding to launch the <br>💥Family Research Council,” <br>the right-wing organization that represents and organizes politically conservative evangelical Christians, <br>and was famously designated an anti-LGBT hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. </p><p>Prince’s son, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Erik" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Erik</span></a>, used his windfall to found <a href="https://c.im/tags/Blackwater" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Blackwater</span></a>, the military contractor that went on to infamy when, in 2007, <br>its mercenaries gunned down civilians in a Baghdad city square. <br>Four Blackwater contractors were convicted in 2014 of killing fourteen unarmed Iraqis “in what prosecutors called a wartime atrocity,” according to the New York Times. <br>Blackwater, since sold and renamed <a href="https://c.im/tags/Academi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Academi</span></a>, was also privately held. <br>It enjoyed more than $1 billion in government contracts. <br>In 2010, according to the Washington Post, </p><p>Prince moved to the United Arab Emirates “amid mounting legal problems for his American business.”</p><p>Both the <a href="https://c.im/tags/Mercers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mercers</span></a> and the <a href="https://c.im/tags/DeVoses" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DeVoses</span></a> pour millions into the political system. <br>You can bet they plan to run the country the same way they have run their companies: using shell games and pyramid schemes, fraud and shakedown.</p><p>According to The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, <a href="https://c.im/tags/Robert" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Robert</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/Mercer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Mercer</span></a> “gave $22.5 million in disclosed donations to Republican candidates and to political-action committees” to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. <br>And that doesn’t include possible donations to nonprofit advocacy groups, now allowed, <br>since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, <br>to conduct advertising for and against political candidates. </p><p>But unlike PACs, these nonprofits<br>—classified as “social welfare” groups<br>—are not required to disclose their donors.</p><p>Politico’s Stanton reports that Betsy and Dick DeVos pretty much own Michigan politics, <br>having spent “at least $100 million on political campaigns and causes over the past 20 years.” <br>The DeVoses used political giving and influence to cut funding to public schools and pave the way for a large influx of charter schools, <br>and to see Michigan, home to the once-mighty United Auto Workers, <br>turned into a so-called right-to-work state, <br>an anti-union designation that translates into greater workplace control for business bosses, but few rights for the bossed</p>