writing.exchange is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A small, intentional community for poets, authors, and every kind of writer.

Administered by:

Server stats:

335
active users

#communicationsdecencyact

1 post1 participant0 posts today

"Once again, several Senators appear poised to gut one of the most important laws protecting internet users - Section 230 (47 U.S.C. § 230).

Don’t be fooled - many of Section 230’s detractors claim that this critical law only protects big tech. The reality is that Section 230 provides limited protection for all platforms, though the biggest beneficiaries are small platforms and users. Why else would some of the biggest platforms be willing to endorse a bill that guts the law? In fact, repealing Section 230 would only cement the status of Big Tech monopolies.

As EFF has said for years, Section 230 is essential to protecting individuals’ ability to speak, organize, and create online.

Congress knew exactly what Section 230 would do – that it would lay the groundwork for speech of all kinds across the internet, on websites both small and large. And that’s exactly what has happened.

Section 230 isn’t in conflict with American values. It upholds them in the digital world. People are able to find and create their own communities, and moderate them as they see fit. People and companies are responsible for their own speech, but (with narrow exceptions) not the speech of others."

eff.org/deeplinks/2025/03/230-

Electronic Frontier Foundation · 230 Protects Users, Not Big TechOnce again, several Senators appear poised to gut one of the most important laws protecting internet users - Section 230 (47 U.S.C. § 230). Don’t be fooled - many of Section 230’s detractors claim that this critical law only protects big tech. The reality is that Section 230 provides limited...

Senators Josh Hawley and Richard Blumenthal introduced legislation that would allow social media companies to be sued for spreading harmful content created with artificial intelligence. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects internet companies from liability for content posted on their platforms, maybe with an AI carve-out in the future. Bipartisan support for the proposal suggests a potential breakthrough after several years of stalled U.S. legislative efforts.

#AI #Section230 #SocialMedia #Legislation #HarmfulMaterial #ArtificialIntelligence #Deepfake #Liability #InternetCompanies #Bipartisan #JoshHawley #RichardBlumenthal #TechSector #Reform #Accountability #Algorithms #ContentDistribution #CommunicationsDecencyAct #Publisher #Speaker

reuters.com/technology/biparti

ReutersBipartisan U.S. bill would end Section 230 immunity for generative AIBy Katie Paul

"Section 230 protection makes it easier for platforms to allow users to post their views without the companies fearing they could be held responsible for those messages. It also gives the platforms peace of mind that they won’t be penalized if they want to remove or demote information they deem to be harmful or objectionable in some way.

These are the cases that threaten to undermine Section 230′s force."

cnbc.com/2023/01/30/the-suprem

#law
#section230
#CommunicationsDecencyAct
#internetfreedom

CNBCHow the Supreme Court could soon change free speech on the internetBy Lauren Feiner

Google und Section 230: US-Gerichtsurteil könnte "Internet auf den Kopf stellen"

Der Supreme Court verhandelt über elementare US-Haftungsprivilegien für soziale Netzwerke. Google mahnt, diese zu erhalten, sonst drohe weitgehende Zensur.

heise.de/news/Google-und-Secti